• Subscribe

    Subscribe to This Week In Panospace by eMail.
    Subscribe in a reader
  • License

    Creative Commons License
    This work is © 2008-2012
    by Yuval Levy
    and licensed under a
    Creative Commons License.
  • Entries

    July 2009
    M T W T F S S
    « Jun   Aug »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Archives

White Balance


Managing and editing colors is central for the digital photography workflow. White balance is one of the cornerstones of color editing. Setting the “right” white balance is most often a question of subjective judgment, interpretation of the scene and its different light sources, or even plain, simple aesthetics.

Digital cameras have controls to make that judgment, automatically, by way of fixed setting, or by precise measurement of the light, usually when pointed at a gray card. And then they have RAW file, where the values are passed as-is, unbalanced, for further processing.

So when qtpfsgui or any other HDR programs merge a few RAWs into an HDR image, no color editing is done yet. Nor is it done during tonemapping. So the resulting tonemapped image often has a color cast, like the one below:

090718chair_tm468The next step is to open it in an image editor and do some color work. In many RAW converters, including proprietary Adobe Lightroom and open source RAWstudio there is a very convenient tool: click on a single point in the image that you think should have neutral (gray) tone. It will be sampled and color will be automatically adjusted accordingly. Despite a very complete set of color tools I did not find anything like this in the GIMP. I found a script by professor Luca de Alfaro to add this functionality. As a script it is slower than a native tool, and it takes more steps (specifically: one extra action in the menu), but it works.

090718chair_ed468

I filed a feature request with Qtpfsgui and with the GIMP.

2 Responses

  1. Gimp’s grey colour picker is in the colors -> levels menu (same as Photoshop’s levels)

  2. @Rog: Thanks, I had overlooked this one. Very complete and same as Photoshop’s indeed. Not as simple as the single click solution in the RAW converters but fast, responsive, and complete.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s