• Subscribe

    Subscribe to This Week In Panospace by eMail.
    Subscribe in a reader
  • License

    Creative Commons License
    This work is © 2008-2012
    by Yuval Levy
    and licensed under a
    Creative Commons License.
  • Entries

    March 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb   Apr »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Archives

Don’t touch my RAW files!


detail of raw image

I am looking for a RAW converter. I am quite happy with Adobe Lightroom, but unfortunately, unlike Photoshop, I can’t get it to work in wine, the tool that enables applications written for Windows to run on Linux.

Even if Photoshop’s RAW converter shares the same DNA, a RAW converter is more useful to me when integrated into the image browser upstream in my workflow, not in the image editor downstream. Therefore, I am looking for an image browser in combination with a RAW converter.

Canon’s DPP works well in Linux, but it would lock me in to a camera vendor. Moreover it lacks the ability to correct chromatic aberration. On the good side, it has a feature that Adobe lacks: true linear conversion.

One major show stopper for me is a RAW converter that writes into the original RAW files! At least DPP is kind enough to ask every time for permission first. Some photo management software does this without asking permission – it assumes it was given when the (default!) preferences were set.

dpp write dialog

Writing to RAW files is a recipe for disaster. RAW files should be treated as if they were read-only. They are unique and precious. Writing to them is off-limit on my system. Any software that can’t respect this basic principle is slated for deletion.

Adobe Lightroom keeps the meta data in its own database. That’s OK, but what if the database corrupts, or if I want to drop in a replacement photo management tool? A database locks me into a format – even if it is an open and well documented format like the one of digiKam.

Better than a database are tiny separate files, XMP sidecars. Adobe Lightroom offers the option (which in my opinion should be the default) to store the metadata in XMP sidecars. And being XML, they can be expanded and translated easily when additional software enters the picture. Embed metadata in derivative work if you wish, but don’t touch my original RAW files. Ever!

converted and processed

8 Responses

  1. Try dcraw

  2. ditto on the dcraw. My basic workflow is:

    (via bash script)
    import raws into YYYY/MM/DD dirs
    use dcraw/imagemagick to create a low res jpeg copy

    Browse the jpegs in iPhoto (one of the fastest and easiest to use browsers imo which shows every pic on one screen)
    Do the processing in ACR and PS

  3. Bibblepro has a browser and comes in a linux version as well. Trial versions are available on their website.

  4. Actually, the latest DPP (3.2.0) does correct some forms of chromatic aberration for known lenses. But that version is relatively hard to find. On the dutch canon website, DPP software download shows version 3.0.1, but via drivers I got 3.2.0.

    The relevant part of the release notes:

    Added Lens aberration correction function (for correcting peripheral illumination, distortion, chromatic aberration, and color blur).

  5. Unfortunately the Gnome GUI changes time stamps when files are dragged from one media to another.

  6. Bibblepro is a really nice RAW converter. You should try trial version.

  7. You were in the same situation I was some time ago. I found the solution by working on several programs.

    Image management: iView MediaPro

    RAW conversioin/processing: Silkypix and PerfectRAW (you can check the info about it on my blog)

    Other processing: Photoshop.

    I think using the best of everything makes it worth.

    Have a nice day.

  8. @John: thanks for making me aware of perfect RAW. Looks like a project to pay attention to. I look forward for the promised source code release.

    I own a license to a previous version of Silkypix and would not touch that stuff with three meters long pole. It has all the qualities I want to avoid in a piece of software.

    I have been using RAWstudio for the past five months and I am very happy with it. The development version even has plug ins such as Lensfun to correct chromatic aberration.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s